Cases 1 - 10 of 276
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eads v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Darnell Eads
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chance Leeds, Kumetris Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
Catherine Bonner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eads v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Darnell Eads
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chance Leeds, Kumetris Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02072
Petitioner:
Melvin Hudson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byrd et al v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
Laquita Byrd and Marcus Byrd
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Kirk Fields and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr.
as 24-5043
Petitioner:
RICKEY BENSON
Respondent:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Sheriff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
