Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Oppenheimer v. Charleston Gateway Properties et al
as 2:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Charleston Gateway Properties, Ellen T Bonner and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Brownstone Investment Group LLC v. Bonner & Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv07351
Defendant:
Jeff Brown, Bonner & Partners, LLC and Bonner & Partners, LLC doing business as Brownstone Research
Plaintiff:
Brownstone Investment Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
MJC Ventures LLC et al v. Detroit Trading Company et al
as 2:2019cv13707
Defendant:
Peter Bonner, Detroit Trading Company, John Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
MJC Ventures LLC and Mark Campbell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Stained Glass Llama, Corp. v. Bonner
as 3:2016cv00253
Defendant:
Robert William Bonner
Plaintiff:
Stained Glass Llama, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Coach, Inc. et al v. Bonner
as 3:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffery W. Bonner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Taylor v. Universal Music Group, Inc.
as 11-4830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Taylor, Collectively and Professionally known as Chaka Demus & Pliers, AKA Chaka Demus and Everton Bonner, Collectively and Professionally known as Chaka Demus & Pliers, AKA Pliers
Defendant - Appellee:
Universal Music Group, Incorporated, Island Records, Incorporated, Polygram Holding, Incorporated and others
Taylor et al v. Universal Music Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05312
Plaintiff:
John Taylor and Everton Bonner
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc., Island Records, Inc., Polygram Holding, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bonner v. Giorgi et al
as 5:2008cv03023
Plaintiff:
James D Bonner
Defendant:
Michael Giorgi, Joshua Felber, Magnum Global Sales, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
