Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sears et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11298
Plaintiff:
Michael Sears , Richard Serrels , Paulette Shaw and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , Flint, City of , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Madera Superior Court et al
as 2:2013cv01897
Plaintiff:
Rayshon Thomas
Defendant:
Madera Superior Court, Joseph Saldano, Thomas L Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. California Supreme Court et al
as 2:2013cv01891
Plaintiff:
Rayshon Thomas
Defendant:
California Supreme Court, Madera Superior Court, Thomas L Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMAS v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63696
Plaintiff:
NA THOMAS and BONNIE THOMAS
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88233
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE LEE THOMAS and BONNIE THOMAS
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMAS et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv87350
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE LEE THOMAS, ARCHIE LEE THOMAS, BONNIE THOMAS and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bonnie Thomas et al v. Artists Rights Enforcement Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv01811
Petitioner:
Bonnie Thomas, Bonnie Thomas and Barabara Jean Haskins
Respondent:
Artists Rights Enforcement Corporation and Charles Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
