Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Boone v. Matthews
as 4:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Boone
Defendant:
Kelly Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shrader v. Isle et al
as 1:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Mr Micheal Shrader and Mr MARK J. LIEBERMAN
Defendant:
Warden Lauren Isle and Warden Mike Boone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davalos v. Warden, FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2023cv01012
Petitioner:
Jose Boone Davalos
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Boone v. Thomas et al
as 7:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Morris De'wayne Boone
Defendant:
Vanessa Thomas, Warden Reitmas and David Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boone v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
JOYCE BOONE
Defendant:
BIG LOTS STORES, LLC and Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Boone v. Pacific Sound, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
John L. Boone
Defendant:
Pacific Sound, Inc. and Nikolay V. Yuzko, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Boone v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00480
Petitioner:
Jose E. Boone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wolfford v. Hendrick Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Hendrick Medical Center, Robertson Unit, James Trammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUBREY v. YRC INC.
as 5:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
RICHARD AUBREY
Defendant:
YRC INC. doing business as YRC Freight
Not Classified By Court:
James Boone Baxter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
