Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Borough of Oakland v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03384
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Borough of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROTONDA v. TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST et al
as 2:2018cv00628
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS J ROTONDA
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST , THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST , VINCENT AUTERI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Babino, et al v. Borough of Oakland
as 15-2381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT BABINO and DEBBIE BABINO, Husband and Wife
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, A Body Politic of the County of Bergen, State of New Jersey and its Respective Public Officials, Departments, Commissions, Authorities, Agencies, Employees, Agents and Subcontractors
BABINO et al v. THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND et al
as 2:2013cv05302
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BABINO and DEBBIE BABINO
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND and JOHN DOES 1-99
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD v. BOROUGH OF OAKLAND et al
as 2:2009cv04965
Plaintiff:
NEAL PRASAD
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, JOHN A. CONTE, JR. and TERRI MALONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VINTAGE CONTRACTING OF NJ, INC. et al v. BOROUGH OF OAKLAND et al
as 2:2009cv03496
Plaintiff:
VINTAGE CONTRACTING OF NJ, INC., VINTAGE CONTRACTING OF NJ, INC., DIVERSIFIED CONTRACTING and others
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, BEATTY, HARVEY & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., NORTH SHORE WALLS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
BOROUGH OF OAKLAND and QUANTUM CORPORATE FUNDING, LTD.
ThirdParty Defendant:
RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, VINTAGE CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., DCCI CORP. and others
Counter Claimant:
QUANTUM CORPORATE FUNDING, LTD.
Counter Defendant:
DIVERSIFIED CONTRACTING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
