Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Odom et al v. BP Products North America Inc et al
as 3:2019cv05520
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, John Doe 1-50, Shell Oil Company and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J Odom, Agnes Marie Odom and Michael Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05546
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Advance Ross Corp , BNSF Railway Company, bp product north america, inc. and atlantic richfield company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America et al v. Advance Ross Sub Co et al
as 3:2015cv05548
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Washington , Puyallup Tribe of Indians and others
Defendant:
Advance Ross Sub Co, BNSF Railway Company, BP Products North America Inc and Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv09358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv09163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-55223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edsel Hoskins v. BP Products North America Inc et al
as 2:2013cv06556
Defendant:
BP Products North America Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Edsel Hoskins
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shalabi et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 3:2013cv05181
Plaintiff:
Hatem Shalabi , Harbor Olympic Land, LLC , Harbor Olympic Land 6031, LLC and others
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company , BP Corporation North America, Inc. , BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00574
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
