Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Woods v. Cadle et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Lindsey Cadle, Apryl Bradshaw, Tonia McFarland Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sarten v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
Avery Sarten
Defendant:
Buddy Bradshaw, Henry J Cullen, Julia C Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledford v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, John Doe I-X, Corey Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Ledford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Unamed Loudon County Goverment Employees and Administrators, Corporal Angi Martin, Buddy Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Terry D King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw et al v. Marriott International Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Farmers Insurance, Diana Walsh, Marriott International Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bradshaw and Katherine Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradshaw v. Standard Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv02056
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Tamara Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angell et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et. al. (TV1)
as 3:2018cv00313
Plaintiff:
William Hendricks, Sherry McKee, Suhn Brown and others
Defendant:
Union Tank Car Company, CSX Transportation, Inc. and Ralph Brackett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ibrihim v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02429
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim
Respondent:
Jackson, A.W. Bradshaw, CCA/Core Logic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mendoza v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02365
Petitioner:
Oliver Rodriguez Mendoza
Respondent:
Jackson, CCA/Core Logic, AW Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crain v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2018cv02360
Petitioner:
Robert Crain
Respondent:
AW Bradshaw, CCA/Core Logic and United States Marshals' Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
