Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Adams v. Brown et al
as 2:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
R Brown, W Cook, R Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. ADOC AL et al
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
ADOC AL ET and Lt. Winfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Mental Health Specialist et al
as 2:2020cv00808
Defendant:
Q Jackson, J Stephens, M Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Sanders et al
as 2:2020cv00809
Defendant:
C Sanders, Alabama Department of Corrections, K Roy and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Ivey et al
as 2:2019cv01063
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey and Christopher Gordy
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Baskin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, T. Brooks, Officer Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Cousin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Officer Contrell and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 2:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Mr. Boyd, Mary Collins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care, Captain Lamar and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Richie et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Warden McClain, Wexford Health Care, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Consolidated Defendant:
Mary Collins, Mr. Turner, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
