Cases 31 - 40 of 192
BUESCHER et al v. BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC et al
as 5:2020cv00147
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-30, MARKUS KLAHN, BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC and others
Plaintiff:
CLARESSA WALLACE, CLARENCE IANNINE, CRAIG COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY et al v. BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv21067
Plaintiff:
Fairfax County Water Authority, City of Richmond, County of Chesterfield and others
Defendant:
BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA INC. and JOHN DOE NOS. 1-50
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY et al v. BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv04846
Plaintiff:
FAIRFAX COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, CITY OF RICHMOND, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE NOS. 1-50 and BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Ratliff et al v. Avon Products Inc et al
as 7:2019cv02570
Defendant:
Coty Inc, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Breentag Specialties Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ennis Ratliff and Lynda Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv16050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15723
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15481
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kaye v. Avon Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06490
Defendant:
PFizer Inc.,, The Proctor & Gamble Company, Macys, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Kaye and Victoria Josephine Kaye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv14903
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
