Cases 1 - 10 of 647
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE OF THE BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT FUND et al v. HOFMANN, INC. an Indiana domestic for-profit corporation,
as 1:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE OF THE BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT FUND, BRICKLAYERS AND TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND (AS SUCCESSOR TO BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND)
Defendant:
HOFMANN, INC.an Indiana domestic for-profit corporation,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. NYC Maintenance & Restoration Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
NYC Maintenance & Restoration Inc. and Zeeshan Raja
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Argila et al v. Luxe General Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Jack Argila, Stonesetting Industry Advancement Fund and Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and the International Masonry Institute
Defendant:
Luxe General Construction Inc., Wynsbert Emmanuel, Doe General Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. Oudaz General Contracting Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Oudaz General Contracting Inc and Ahmed Ouda
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Masonry Security Plan of Washington et al v. Peninsula Masonry & Restoration LLC
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Masonry Security Plan of Washington, BAC Local No. 1 Washington Pension Trust, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Peninsula Masonry & Restoration, LLC and Peninsula Masonry & Restoration LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of Ohio Bricklayers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Snyder Tile & Mosaics LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Trustees of Ohio Bricklayers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
Snyder Tile & Mosaics LLC and Brandon T. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Michigan BAC Pension Fund et al v. KP Flooring, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Michigan BAC Pension Fund, BAC of Michigan Health and Welfare Fund, Statewide Trowel Trades Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
KP Flooring, Inc. a Michigan corporation, Kenneth Pilarski and KP Flooring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. Blade Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08768
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Blade Contracting Inc. and Vincent Punzone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Argila et al v. A. Ottavino Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv10410
Plaintiff:
Jack Argila, Stonesetting Industry Advancement Fund and Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and the International Masonry Institute
Defendant:
A. Ottavino Corp., Doe General Contractor and Doe Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Argila et al v. Fidelis Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06761
Plaintiff:
Jack Argila and Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and the International Masonry Institute
Defendant:
Fidelis Contracting, Inc., Doe General Contractor and Doe Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
