Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Barrett v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Bryan Randall Barrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Bryan Barrett
as 16-51337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRYAN RANDALL BARRETT
BALLARD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02244
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BALLARD , DWILDA BALLARD , MICHAEL BASNIGHT and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC., NFL PROPERTIES, L.L.C., RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ballard et al v. National Football League, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02273
Plaintiff:
Howard Ballard , Dwilda Ballard , Michael Basnight and others
Defendant:
National Football League, Inc., NFL Properties, L.L.C., Riddell, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GERONIMO et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
HARLYN GERONIMO, HARLYN C. GERONIMO, KATE GERONIMO and others
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ROBERT M. GATES, PETE GEREN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bryan Monkres v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 08-16011
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRYAN RANDALL MONKRES
Respondent - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDC
Bryan Monkres v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 08-15593
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRYAN RANDALL MONKRES
Respondent - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDC
Monkres v. Kernan et al
as 4:2004cv02311
Petitioner:
Bryan Randall Monkres
Respondent:
Attorney General State of CA , Rosanne Campbell and Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
