Cases 21 - 30 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
BRYANT v. POTTSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2022cv02954
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA BRYANT
Defendant:
POTTSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYANT v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH
as 2:2022cv02957
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA BRYANT
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TRENTON MUNICIPAL COURT et al v. JEFFERSON
as 3:2022cv04676
Plaintiff:
TRENTON MUNICIPAL COURT and KRISTINA M. BRYANT
Defendant:
KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
BRYANT v. POTTSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2022cv02664
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA BRYANT
Defendant:
POTTSTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KOSTOVSKI v. BRYANT et al
as 3:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
SUZANA KOSTOVSKI
Defendant:
ELIJAH BRYANT, THOMAS BOYD, SEASIDE HEIGHTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
GREGORY v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
RONALD GREGORY
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, OFFICER BRYANT ROWAN, JR, OFFICER J GARLARZA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
