Cases 61 - 70 of 2,035
Bryant v. US Dept of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
US Dept of Transportation and Lincoln Car Sales & Dealership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. HUD et al
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
HUD, Fair Housing and Willie-Cop-e-land Thieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Door to Door Thieves, Black Mafia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Gwinnett County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tracey Bryant
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Detention Center, Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department, Keybo Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
United States, FBIncome, Willie Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, FBIncome and Willie Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Bryant et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Johnson
Defendant:
Jeffery Bryant, Marcus Henderson and Leonard Re'Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VARGO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
DERRICK VARGO
Defendant:
BRYANT WILLIAMS and JAMES MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
