Cases 11 - 20 of 670
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv05048
Petitioner:
NORMAN BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
URBEN v. GridKor, LLC et al
as 2:2023mc00151
Plaintiff:
AVONDA URBEN
Defendant:
GridKor, LLC, MICHAEL BRYANT, KorDev LLC and others
SCUTELLA v. TRINITY FOOD SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Defendant:
TRINITY FOOD SERVICES, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, DEPUTY WARDEN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv04494
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HUNTER v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
SEYMOUR SUTTER, LT. VOLZ, WARDEN SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS et al v. MARLEIHIA HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv03867
Plaintiff:
DANEE SLAYTON, KELVIN DANIELS, UMIR IDRIS and others
Defendant:
MARLEIHIA HARPER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICE, NICOLE MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BRYANT v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2023cv03585
Plaintiff:
TAMEL BRYANT
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
