Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillman v. Tillman et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Marialina T. Tillman
Defendant:
Bryant T. Tillman, Chelsa Hehl, Allyson Valdivia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. USA
as 4:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Phillip Michael Bryant
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kenon v. Levelle et al
as 3:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Bryant Kenon
Defendant:
Thomas Dervis Levelle, Harey Smith, Jr. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Bryant v. Leu
as 2:2023cv00374
Petitioner:
Louis Antonio Bryant
Respondent:
Warden Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BRYANT v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRYANT
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Parker v. VA Parole
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Bryant Matthew Parker
Defendant:
VA Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Urben v. GridKor, LLC, et al.
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Avonda Urben
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
GridKor, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Bryant, Alyssa Schrecengost Bryant and KorDev LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jane Does (1-5) and John Does (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
