Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv19948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DARRAGH v. BT AMERICAS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv19948
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA DARRAGH
Defendant:
BT AMERICAS, INC., BT Group, PLC, NADJA RISSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PAMCAH-AU Local 675 Pension Fu, et al v. BT Group PLC, et al
as 20-2106
Defendant / Appellee:
NICK ROSE, GAVIN E. PATTERSON, RICHARD CAMERON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAYTON HOLLISTER and PAMCAH-AU LOCAL 675 PENSION FUND
Hollister v. BT Group PLC et al
as 1:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
Clayton Hollister
Defendant:
BT Group PLC , Ian Livingston , Gavin E. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sarraf v. BT Group PLC et al
as 1:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
Alex Sarraf
Defendant:
BT Group PLC, Gavin E. Patterson, Ian Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CHRISTIAN v. BT GROUP PLC et al
as 2:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHRISTIAN
Defendant:
BT GROUP PLC, GAVIN PATTERSON, IAN LIVINGSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Relay IP Inc. v. BT Group plc et al
as 1:2013cv00771
Plaintiff:
Relay IP Inc.
Defendant:
BT Group plc and BT Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Comcast Cable Communications LLC et al v. British Telecommunciations PLC et al
as 3:2012cv01712
Plaintiff:
Comcast Cable Communications LLC , Comcast MO Group Inc , National Digital Television Center LLC and others
Defendant:
British Telecommunciations PLC, BT Group PLC, BT Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Conexant Systems, Inc. v. British Telecommunications PLC et al
as 3:2007cv00573
Plaintiff:
Conexant Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
British Telecommunications PLC and BT Group PLC
Counter Claimant:
British Telecommunications PLC and British Telecommunications PLC
Counter Defendant:
Conexant Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
