Cases 61 - 70 of 807
Brezonick v. Brandt
as 1:2022cv02823
Petitioner:
Matthew Brezonick
Respondent:
Matthew Brandt
Interested Party:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00923
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv02801
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York and Malachi Z. York
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacote, Jr. v. FBP
as 22-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BACOTE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cosby v. ADX et al
as 1:2022cv02531
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Cosby, Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D. Cosmo Cosby
Defendant:
ADX, USP HGH, Complex AW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemus-Morales v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv02501
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lemus-Morales
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Doe et al
as 5:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Warden FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Curry v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 1:2022cv02159
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jensen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00525
Petitioner:
Kent Jensen
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Javier Rodriguez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
