Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,130
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dr. LaKeshia Ball et al v. Talladega County School System et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff: Dr. LaKeshia Ball, Katrina Burk, Erika Cole and others
Defendant: Talladega County School System and Suzanne Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01761
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cook v. Burke et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: Marcus Cook
Defendant: Mr. Burke and Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant: 3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: Joel Hammer, James Barnes, J Kim Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11171
Petitioner: ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Respondent: CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11170
Plaintiff: ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Defendant: CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Burke v. Sales We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff: William Burke
Defendant: WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burks v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff: Roland L. Burks
Defendant: Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00962
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?