Cases 1 - 10 of 1,130
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dr. LaKeshia Ball et al v. Talladega County School System et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Dr. LaKeshia Ball, Katrina Burk, Erika Cole and others
Defendant:
Talladega County School System and Suzanne Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran, Strike Officer Hollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cook v. Burke et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Mr. Burke and Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hammer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Hammer, James Barnes, J Kim Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11171
Petitioner:
ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Respondent:
CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11170
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Defendant:
CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Burke v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv20635
Plaintiff:
SEAN W BURKE and Sean W. Burke
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
