Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BOWEN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00220
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, CHAPLIN MILLER, Captain LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANDERSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S et al
as 2:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S, S.C.I. FRACKVILLE STAFF, DOWD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/BUSINESS OFFICE MANAGER et al
as 2:2015cv04205
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/BUSINESS OFFICE MANAGER, JULIO ALGARIN, NANCY T. MCFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Concert v. Luzerne Borough Administrative Offices et al
as 3:2011cv02333
Plaintiff:
Thomas Concert
Defendant:
Luzerne Borough Administrative Offices, James Keller and All Multi-Purpose Business Offices and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv01656
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MILLER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2008cv02751
Plaintiff:
LARRY MILLER
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and BUSINESS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEMANCHE v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2008cv02581
Plaintiff:
ADAM J. DEMANCHE
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and BUSINESS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROWN v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2008cv01708
Plaintiff:
CURTIS A. BROWN
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and BUSINESS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2008cv01688
Plaintiff:
LARRY L. MILLER
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and BUSINESS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
