Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bah v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv08731
Plaintiff:
Mariama Bah
Defendant:
The City of New York, Kenneth Fischer and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Lollipop Gang & Conspirators et al
as 3:2013cv02085
Defendant:
'Bah Hum Bug', BMRC Eastern Oregon Hospital, FBI and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Isabella Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morris v. Lollipop Gang & Conspirators et al
as 3:2013cv02084
Defendant:
'Bah Hum Bug', Ginger Kay Floyd, Kendra Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Isabella Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morris v. Lollipop Gang & Conspirators et al
as 3:2013cv02086
Defendant:
'Bah Hum Bug', Ginger Kay Floyd, Kendra Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Catherine Isabella Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bah et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv02789
Plaintiff:
Natu Bah , Diariou Diallo , Aminata Kaba and others
Defendant:
State Of Tennessee, Attorney General of the State of Tennessee and Tennessee State Board of Cosmetology
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Bah v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06690
Plaintiff:
Oumou Bah
Defendant:
The City of New York and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bah v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04557
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bah
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
