Cases 11 - 20 of 2,074
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zoe El v. Rojas et al
as 0:2024cv60454
Plaintiff:
Chris Zoe El
Defendant:
R. Rojas, Phoebee Rebecca Francois, Mindy F Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA)
Bailey v. Willis et al
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bailey
Defendant:
Fani Willis, Melynee Leftridge and Kristin Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bailey v. 10 Executive Park GA Partners LLC
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Shayla Bailey
Defendant:
10 Executive Park GA Partners LLC doing business as Oleander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bailey v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Rogers (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bailey
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Other:
Jack L. Townsend, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
