Cases 21 - 30 of 91
CITIBANK, N.A. v. LANCE BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02373
Defendant:
LANCE BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC., LANCELOT O BAILEY, THE BAILEY HENDERSON LIVING TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. AZAR et al
as 1:2019cv01721
Plaintiff:
BENNY RAY BAILEY
Defendant:
ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, JOANNE M. CHIEDI and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAILEY v. GENTRY
as 1:2019cv00107
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEE BAILEY
Defendant:
KELLY ANN GENTRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2018cv03025
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. BAILEY
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND and KELLY A. GENTRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv02013
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AHS CUSHING HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. ALEX M. AZAR II
as 1:2018cv01454
Plaintiff:
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF POLK COUNTY, ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER, INC., LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00867
Plaintiff:
REEDLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, PORTLAND ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS HOSPITAL - PLYMOUTH, INC. and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BAILEY v. SESSIONS
as 1:2018cv00848
Petitioner:
DARRELL LAMONT BAILEY
Respondent:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TOOLASPRASHAD v. SHULKIN et al
as 1:2018cv00631
Plaintiff:
L. TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, PERRY HOLLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
