Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Balkcom v. Semiklose et al
as 2:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Balcom and Jerry Lee Balkcom
Defendant:
Charles Devin Semiklose and Jacob Matthew Zavacky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Balcom et al v. Peterson et al
as 3:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Balcom, Mary Barnes and Larry Balcom
Defendant:
April Peterson, Clinton Peterson and Foreclosure Help, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
THOLE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. THOLE, JOAN M. THOLE, GAIL ANN BALCOM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Balcom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05910
Plaintiff:
John J Balcom
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Willis v. Northwest Alabama Health Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Carrie Willis
Defendant:
Northwest Alabama Health Services LLC d/b/a Keller EMS - Franklin, City of Russellville, Alabama, Chris Hargett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
BALCOM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61765
Plaintiff:
WARREN BALCOM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Balcom v. Saul
as 3:2020cv12660
Plaintiff:
Jacob E. Balcom
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BALCOM II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04881
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENT BALCOM II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
