Cases 1 - 10 of 1,031
Barfield v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Dennis Barfield
Defendant:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Glass v. Regions Financial Corporation
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Mary A Glass
Defendant:
Regions Financial Corporation doing business as Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Autry v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Tanya R Autry
Defendant:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Hughes v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Karen Hughes
Defendant:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Martin v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Martin
Defendant:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Whitlock v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Sharon Whitlock
Defendant:
Centennial Bank doing business as Happy State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gomez et al v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Obed Gomez, Jr, Moses A Gallens and Jeannie Melillo
Defendant:
Centennial Bank doing business as Happy State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tingle v. Collins et al
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Jazmine Tingle
Defendant:
Adrienne Collins and Bank of Oklahoma NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
