Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alexander v. Bank Plus
as 23-60569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firnist J. Alexander
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank Plus and Jeptha F. Barbour
Alexander v. Bank Plus et al
as 3:2021cv00496
Plaintiff:
Firnist J. Alexander
Defendant:
Bank Plus and Jeptha F. Barbour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Edwards v. Bank Plus
as 3:2019cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Edwards
Defendant:
Bank Plus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Bank Plus et al
as 3:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Bank Plus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Bank Plus
as 3:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edwards
Defendant:
Bank Plus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. CITI Mortgage, et al
as 3:2013cv00836
Plaintiff:
Charles Young and Linda Young
Defendant:
CITI Mortgage Inc., Gov. Federal Reserve Bank of N.Y., Board of Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Young v. CITI Mortgage, et al
as 5:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Charles Young and Linda Young
Defendant:
CITI Mortgage Inc., Gov. Federal Reserve Bank of N.Y., Board of Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Southland Health Services, Inc. et al v. Bank Plus et al
as 5:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Southland Health Services, Inc. , Paladin Holdings, Inc. and Larry N Lunan
Defendant:
Bank Plus , Clanton Dubose , Dudley Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Southland Health Services, Inc. et al v. Bank Plus et al
as 3:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Southland Health Services, Inc. , Paladin Holdings, Inc. and Larry N Lunan
Defendant:
Bank Plus , Clanton Dubose, Dudley Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. Brady Brothers Timber Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00115
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brady Brothers Timber Company, Inc., Shubuta Creek Properties, LLC, Tarr Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
