Cases 1 - 10 of 1,905
Taylor et al v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 5:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Sean Taylor and Rachel Hawkins
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank and Synchrony Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Moore
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Sterling Moore d/b/a Outer Banks Adventures;
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELISABETH FISHER WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BYRAM v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BYRAM
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers Act
Pinnacle Bank v. Veterinary Management Incorporated, et al
as 3:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Bank
Defendant:
Veterinary Management Incorporated, Main Street Veterinary Holdings, LLC, David S Hoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
JACOBSEN v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
KAREN JACOBSEN
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS and others
The Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts v. Hughes
as 5:2024cv00126
Defendant:
Madeline Hughes and Madelyn Hughes
Plaintiff:
The Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
Dennie v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dennie
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
