Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Carr v. Marshall County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2011cv02834
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office , Scott Walls , Dewayne Bankson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickson v. Walls et al
as 4:2011cv02144
Plaintiff:
Donald Clinton Dickson
Defendant:
Scott Walls and Bankson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Marshall et al
as 4:2011cv01574
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Todd
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, Dewayne Bankson, Penny Windsor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regie Lopez v. Chief of Police et al
as 2:2011cv02058
Defendant:
Bankson, Chief of Police, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Regie Lopez
Lopez v. Chief of Police et al
as 3:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
Regie Lopez
Defendant:
Chief of Police, Wardle, Bankson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drawsand v. F.F. Properties, L.L.P. et al
as 3:2010cv03937
Plaintiff:
Pamela Drawsand
Defendant:
F.F. Properties, L.L.P., Fairfield Barrington Properties, Montelena Apartment Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drawsand v. F.F. Properties, L.L.P. et al
as 4:2010cv03937
Plaintiff:
Pamela Drawsand
Defendant:
F.F. Properties, L.L.P., Fairfield Barrington Properties, Montelena Apartment Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgewater v. Hayes Valley Limited Partnership et al
as 4:2010cv03022
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater
Defendant:
Hayes Valley Limited Partnership, McCormack Baron Ragan Management Services Inc., MBA Urban Development Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgewater v. Bankson et al
as 4:2010cv00704
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater
Defendant:
Shawn Bankson, Jane Creason and Kimball Tirey & St. John, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bridgewater v. Bankson et al
as 3:2010cv00704
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater
Defendant:
Shawn Bankson, Jane Creason and Kimball Tirey & St. John, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
