Cases 1 - 9 of 9
KAETZ v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2019cv08100
Defendant:
HILLARY CLINTON, THE UNITED STATES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Smith v. Knights of Columbus et al
as 1:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Gerald I. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Knights of Columbus, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
WIRTH v. OBAMA
as 2:2014cv00890
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WIRTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCCRAY v. UNITE HERE et al
as 1:2013cv06540
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL MCCRAY
Defendant:
UNITE HERE, UNITE HERE GENERAL EXECUTIVE BOARD, UNITE HERE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
LEATHERMAN v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2012cv01486
Plaintiff:
NAOMI LEATHERMAN
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leatherman v. Obama et al
as 1:2012cv01317
Plaintiff:
Naomi Leatherman
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, National Security Agency, Quest Diagnostics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PERALES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and DANIEL KEN "DAN&q INOUYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. PENTAGON, U.S. SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KERCHNER et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. KERCHNER, JR., LOWELL T. PATTERSON, DARRELL JAMES LENORMAND and others
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
