Cases 1 - 10 of 343
Schmidt v. Boar's Head Provisions Co., Inc.
as 3:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Barbara Schmidt
Defendant:
Boar's Head Provisions Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morgan v. Wood
as 1:2024cv01455
Plaintiff:
Barbara Morgan
Defendant:
Iris Hilda Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arbaiza et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Arbaiza and William I. Arbaiza
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Ali v. Schweiner et al
as 1:2024cv00897
Defendant:
Carl Schweiner, Robert Poulin, Carrie Poulin and others
Plaintiff:
Kazim Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Morris v. McRae et al
as 1:2024cv00887
Defendant:
Yu, Portia Bennett, Mark Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Owen Morris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Outlaw v. Meade et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Ober
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. et al v. CureVac SE
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Ying Tam, Paulo Lin and others
Defendant:
Michael Hope and CureVac SE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 256 Patent Non-Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
