Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00673
Defendant:
THOMAS M. ALLEN, DOUGLAS BARNES, BARTH and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Honorable v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jerry T Honorable
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon , Edwin G Buss , Mark Levenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Washington v. Brubaker
as 3:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Farley Washington
Defendant:
Barbara Brubaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Marwan Ransom
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Indiana Department of Corrections , Bruce Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bained v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Bained
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Indiana Department of Corrections , Bruce Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garner v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Martin Garner
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Indiana Department of Corrections , Bruce Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00537
Plaintiff:
Russell Ernest Boyd
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Michael A Mitcheff, Dr Rachel L Ross MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01321
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ERNEST BOYD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL A. MITCHEFF, D.O., RACHEL L. ROSS, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turcsik v. Mitcheff et al
as 3:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Stephen J Turcsik
Defendant:
Dr Michael Mitcheff, Barbara Brubaker, Dr John Israel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
