Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
SHOAF v. BEDWELL et al
as 1:2024cv01586
Defendant: BARBARA RIGGS, BEDWELL, CRINEDDIN and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SHOAF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Gilman v. Samuel Byrd, et al
as 24-1951
Defendant: LEE ANN MURRAY, R.N., DANIEL BEDWELL, SAMUEL BYRD, M.D. and others
Plaintiff: JAMES E. GILMAN
RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00198
Defendant: SARA BEDWELL, CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY and others
Plaintiff: MARK RUTHRAUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: EARL MARTIN
Defendant: SAMUEL BYRD, CASEY CAMBEL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: KEITH ALLEN BALL
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, BARBARA RIGGS and JANE OR JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant: MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNN v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: ROBERT DUNN
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, NAVEEN RAJOLI, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff: GENARO GARCIA
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL, ASHLEY PARIDO, JASON POWERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff: BRYCE POPE
Defendant: SAMUEL BYRD, BEDWELL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Drucker, II v. Barbara Riggs, et al
as 23-1491
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARL J. DRUCKER, II
Defendant / Appellee: BARBARA RIGGS, NAVEEN RAJOLI, KIM HOBSON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?