Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Jeremy Jennings v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 11-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY JASON JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, JENNIFER GRANHOLM, BRIAN MAJERCZYK, aka Brain Majerczyk and others
Joseph Nelson v. James Atterberry, et al
as 11-1058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHN NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ATTERBERRY, SHAREE BOOKER, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden and others
Chambers #095405 v. Granholm et al
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers #095405
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Jackson v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 10-2597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS O. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, BARBARA SAMPSON, JAMES ATTERBERRY and others
Chambers v. Granholm et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv14761
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Hill et al v. Granholm et al
as 5:2010cv14568
Plaintiff:
Henry Hill , Jemal Tipton , Damion Todd and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, Patricia Caruso and Barbara Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings #733741 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2010cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jason Jennings #733741
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Jennifer Granholm, Brian Majerczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson #451880 v. Atterberry et al
as 1:2010cv01010
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Nelson #451880
Defendant:
James Atterberry, Sharee Booker, Patricia Caruso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle #220889 v. Brown et al
as 1:2010cv00992
Plaintiff:
Stanley Battle #220889
Defendant:
Charles Brown and Barbara Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil #289658 v. Caruso et al
as 1:2010cv00977
Petitioner:
James McNeil #289658
Respondent:
Patricia Caruso and Barbara Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
