Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Slate v. N & F Logistic, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00050
Defendant:
N & F Logistic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barney Slate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade et al v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00897
Defendant:
Desmond Barney, City of Jackson, Mississippi, Anthony Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Vernice Robinson and Bettersten R. Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2019cv00780
Plaintiff:
Barry Rushing, Cathy Tarver, Barney Rosemon and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lampley et al v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00723
Plaintiff:
Rakasha Adams, Desmond Barney, Lincoln Lampley and others
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi and Chief James Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barney v. Singing River Health Systems
as 1:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Autry Earl Barney
Defendant:
Singing River Health Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thames v. Barneys
as 2:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Addison R. Thames
Defendant:
Anthony Barneys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swindoll v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 3:2015cv00184
Plaintiff:
Barney Swindoll
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Vohra et al v. Morgan Stanley & Co. et al
as 3:2015cv00549
Petitioner:
Rahul Vohra , Sherry Vohra , Barbara Carter Summers and others
Respondent:
Morgan Stanley & Co. and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Ellis v. White et al
as 3:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Stella Ellis
Defendant:
Kenneth White, Dean Poyner, Juston Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barney v. Hinds County Detention Facility Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2013cv00611
Plaintiff:
David Barney, Jr.
Defendant:
Hinds County Detention Facility Board of Supervisors and Tyrone Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
