Cases 1 - 10 of 18
KNOX v. CHEATAM et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
KEVERY KRISTOPHER KNOX
Defendant:
CHEATAM, T. BARNHART and J. SAJNAJ SAJNAJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BARNHART et al v. BRANHAM et al
as 4:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
STAN BARNHART and DONNA BARNHART
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, GREG DAY, TONY SEIDL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIUS DEONTE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, EDWARDS, ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALTERS v. CRANK et al
as 2:2019cv00568
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, ANASTASIA BARNHART, STEPHANIE CRANK and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnhart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv00083
Defendant:
COMM'R of SOC S ANDREW M. SAUL and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jason E Barnhart
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Barnhart et al v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company Inc
as 3:2019cv00094
Plaintiff:
Clarence Barnhart and Bobbie Barnhart
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company Inc and Auto Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIDLEY v. BARNHART et al
as 1:2016cv00097
Respondent:
BARNHART and GREGORY ZOELLER
Petitioner:
DAREN E. RIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
