Cases 41 - 50 of 98
PARKER v. DEL RICCI et al
as 2:2015cv03513
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
THOMAS M. DEL RICCI, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION, RISA V. FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAFOND v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Petitioner:
RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CLIFTON THOMAS BARRETT, JOSE SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRIGGS v. KOONS et al
as 5:2015cv01849
Plaintiff:
BARRETT QUATINE GRIGGS
Defendant:
RYAN A. KOONS, ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPT., MUNICIPALITY OF ALLENTOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. I.R.S. et al
as 1:2015cv01311
Petitioner:
HERBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
I.R.S. , L. FOWLER, DEIDRE MORRON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
GRIGGS v. BANACH et al
as 5:2015cv00653
Petitioner:
BARRETT Q. GRIGGS
Respondent:
KELLY BANACH, DAVID HOWELLS and RONALD MANESCU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARRETT v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BARRETT
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN HENDRICKS, DIRECTOR ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMBERT v. OWENS et al
as 2:2014cv01521
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, GEORGE PETSOCK, RICHARD SLAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett Tunsil v. Philadelphia Prison System, et al
as 14-4052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, SUPERINTENDENT CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
BARRETT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv01336
Petitioner:
ANGELO ANTHONY BARRETT
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN WETZEL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (PENNSYLVANIA) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
