Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BENNETT v. BORDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
TYLER BORDEN, BARRETT and NOAH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. BALL et al
as 2:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
SAMANTHA BALL, DYLAN RUMER, MICHAEL HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARRETT v. BRANHAM et al
as 4:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, MIKE BRANHAM and MIKE HAAG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRETT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv00596
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T.J. WATSON and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EUGENE BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHENEMAN v. DEGUILIO et al
as 2:2016cv00163
Defendant:
JESSE BARRETT, BARBARA BROOK, DAVID CAPP and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIE SHENEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHENEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv00008
Defendant:
JESSE BARRETT, BARBARA BROOK, DAVID CAPP and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIE SHENEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARRETT v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00132
Petitioner:
JAMES BARRETT
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARRETT v. BUSSE et al
as 1:2011cv00284
Defendant:
DOUG BARNES, T. BEAN, JERRY BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDUL-WADOOD et al v. BUSSE et al
as 1:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
LOKMAR Y. ABDUL-WADOOD, JAMES J. BARRETT, DAVE CALLOWAY and others
Defendant:
DOUG BARNES, T. BEAN, JERRY BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KING v. BURISS et al
as 2:2008cv00376
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE KING
Defendant:
CHARLES BURISS, TONY BAUER, CHRIS GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
