Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Glover et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv04587
Plaintiff:
Robert Glover, Jerome Givens, Cynthia Corona and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
English v. Bartel, et. al.
as 1:2019cv00209
Petitioner:
Roderick English
Respondent:
United States Court, District of South Carolina, Warden Bartel and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bartell v. York County et al
as 0:2018cv00422
Plaintiff:
William D. Bartell
Defendant:
York County , Rock Hill, City of , Doug Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canty v. Miller et al
as 0:2017cv01291
Plaintiff:
Darryl Canty
Defendant:
FNU Miller, FNU Bartell, FNU Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Bartell et al
as 4:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Nathanael L Reynolds
Defendant:
John H Bartell, Jr, Investigator Kennedy and W Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartel et al v. Marine Transport Lines Inc
as 2:2014cv03395
Plaintiff:
Willard E Bartel and David C Peebles
Defendant:
Marine Transport Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv02211
Plaintiff:
Paul Weary McFadden, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections, Bartelle, Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mitchum et al v. Bartelle et al
as 4:2011cv01837
Plaintiff:
Silverteen Mitchum and Mamie Gamble
Defendant:
Norma Bartelle, Barbara McKenzie, Norman Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
