Cases 61 - 66 of 66
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC et al v. R.A.S., Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01244
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and others
Defendant:
R.A.S., Inc., Kim Schwartz and Arna Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC et al v. J. Nix Company, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv01811
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robins Franchised Shops, LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC, BR IP Holder, LLC and others
Defendant:
J. Nix Company, LLC and Jeffrey L. Nix
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC et al v. Arizona Scoops et al
as 2:2008cv01727
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and BR IP Holder, LLC
Defendant:
Arizona Scoops and Charles K Braun
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC et al v. Medeiros & Pacheco Management Corporation et al
as 6:2008cv01531
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and others
Defendant:
Medeiros & Pacheco Management Corporation, Ana Medeiros, Mario Medeiros and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC et al v. INDO RAHWAY SOUTH DONUTS LLC et al
as 2:2008cv01818
Plaintiff:
DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISED RESTAURANTS LLC, DD IP HOLDER LLC and others
Defendant:
INDO RAHWAY SOUTH DONUTS LLC, INDO EDISON DONUTS LLC, INDO IRVINGTON DONUTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dunkin Donuts Franchised Resturants LLC et al v. Agawam Donuts Inc et al
as 1:2007cv11444
Plaintiff:
Dunkin Donuts Franchised Resturants LLC, Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, DD IP Holder LLC and others
Defendant:
Agawam Donuts, Inc., B.E. Donuts, Inc., Belmont Donuts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
