Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. BAUMGARTNER et al
as 1:2021cv01807
Defendant:
Curt Dittmaier and Curtis Baumgartner
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODNER et al v. ATS MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC, et al.
as 1:2016cv01131
Defendant:
ATS MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC and BRADLEY BULL
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BAUMGARTNER and ELIZABETH GOODNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
CHALLIEH v. CITY OF LOVES PARK et al
as 1:2010mc00080
Defendant:
DEPUTY CORONER ROBERT BAUMGARTNER, JR., CITY OF LOVES PARK, COUNTY OF WINNEBAGO and others
Plaintiff:
YVONNE CHALLIEH
Carnes v. Carnes et al
as 1:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
John M Carnes
Defendant:
Lynette A Rice, Rice Family, Thomas Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUDGINS v. MARBERRY et al
as 1:2009cv00326
Plaintiff:
DONALD HUDGINS
Defendant:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, B.R. JETT, J. OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HENRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
MCINTOSH v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ALBERTO R. GONZALES, MICHAEL MUSKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JANIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
GUST MARION JANIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
