Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Portville Truck and Auto Repair, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01045
Defendant:
Beam Mack Sales & Service, Inc. and Mack Trucks, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Portville Truck and Auto Repair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broad Beam Media, Inc v. Bluewater Media, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02214
Defendant:
ANDREW LATIMER and BLUEWATER MEDIA, LLC
Plaintiff:
BROAD BEAM MEDIA, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
United States of America v. One 24-Foot Hydro Yacht et al
as 8:2019cv00265
Defendant:
One 24-Foot Hydro Yacht and One aluminum beam boat trailer
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1595 a Customs Duties: Forfeiture and Other Penalties
Abel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11253
Plaintiff:
Martin Berry, Gaetano Abramo, Manuel Bande and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Pediatric Dental PLLC et al v. Metlife, Inc.
as 1:2018cv09113
Plaintiff:
LBD MANAGEMENT CORP., BEAM A SMILE DENTAL PLLC, BAYRIDGE MANAGEMENT PLUS CORP. and others
Defendant:
METLIFE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hernandez-Merchan v. 204 West 88th Street, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
Edgar Hernandez-Merchan
Defendant:
204 West 88th Street, LLC and Tina Beame
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jozwicki et al v. Beam Construction, Inc. et al
as 7:2017cv01084
Plaintiff:
Piotr Jozwicki and Michal Skrzeczkowski
Defendant:
Beam Construction, Inc. and Mark Fabjanowski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Siles v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv04610
Plaintiff:
Shana Glenn Siles
Defendant:
Orange County Jail and Asia Beams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
