Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BEARD v. HANNA
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
SCOTT J. BEARD
Defendant:
NASSAR HANNA and IU SIMON CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
BEARD v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE JO BEARD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BEARD v. AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
ROGER BEARD
Defendant:
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., JAMAL OMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
VANDENBOOM v. INDOI AGENCY et al
as 1:2022cv02006
Plaintiff:
MARK A. VANDENBOOM
Defendant:
INDOI AGENCY, AMY L. BEARD, ROBERT STROHMEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
SCOTT v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv03085
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAMAR SCOTT
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA PROSECUTORS OFFICE, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF AND DEPUTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALL v. BOONE COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2021cv01881
Defendant:
MIKE NIELSEN, THOMAS BEARD and BOONE COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEWIS SMALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEARD v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 1:2021cv01906
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
COYLE BEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
