Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Beasley v. Pierce County Council et al
as 3:2023cv05777
Plaintiff:
Da'menique Lajuan Beasley
Defendant:
Pierce County Council, Ed Troyer, Patti Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Haynes
as 2:2022cv00258
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Stuart Beasley
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Beasley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tanita April Beasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Beasley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv05981
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shaylene Nichol Beasley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Holmes et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2016cv05177
Plaintiff:
Irene Jane Holmes, RVHK, TMHK, Jr and others
Defendant:
State of Washington, CPS, DCFS and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Kittleson et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2016cv05178
Plaintiff:
Tim Kittleson, RVHK, TMHK, Jr and others
Defendant:
State of Washington, CPS, DCFS and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Walsh et al v. Lucas et al
as 3:2015cv05440
Plaintiff:
Todd Walsh
Defendant:
Garry Lucas , Clark County , Devin Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beasley v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05322
Plaintiff:
David W. Beasley
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Beasley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv01106
Plaintiff:
Jerymaine Beasley
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
