Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals AMericas Inc, Corporation Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Bates v. Becker et al
as 2:2021cv00086
Petitioner:
Earl Eugene Bates, Jr
Respondent:
Jason Becker, Jr and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bates v. Becker et al
as 2:2020cv01946
Defendant:
Beverly Phillips and Jason Becker, Jr
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01932
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Mayes v. Windom et al
as 5:2018cv01589
Defendant:
Mary Becker Windom and Attorney General State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Tecumseh Mondez Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Etheredge v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2018cv01553
Defendant:
Thompson, Lawerence County Jail, Gene Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Etheredge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steiger v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00893
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Defendant:
Luther Strange, Edward McFerrin, Terri Bozeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Windom et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Webb
Defendant:
Mary Becker Windom, J. Elizabeth Kellum and Ferris Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
