Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carter v. Beckham et al
as 3:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Robert Carter
Defendant:
f/n/u Beckham, f/n/u Harrington, f/n/u Salewsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Dickson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miles
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff's Office, Southern Medical Associates, Sgt. (f/n/u) Siddal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Total Grow Holdings, LLC et al v. Tennessee Extracts, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Total Grow Holdings, LLC, TG Tech Holdings, LLC and TGC Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Tennessee Extracts, LLC, Leslie Hough, Joshua Beckham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Beckham v. Dayton Freight Lines, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Courtneigh Beckham
Defendant:
Dayton Freight Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Summerville v. Gilbert et al
as 2:2019cv02164
Plaintiff:
Melvin Summerville
Defendant:
Andy Dupree, Jamie Kidd, David Beckham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Lester et al
as 1:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Hale
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Jerry Lane, Melvin Tiry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Beckham v. Hamilton County, Tennessee
as 1:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Nancy C. Beckham
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2006cv02876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
