Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Beers v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Alysia Beers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CANNON v. M. SERRA, LLC
as 2:2023cv02701
Plaintiff:
BILL CANNON
Defendant:
M. SERRA, LLC doing business as SERRA BEER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ROSEWOOD FARMS COUNTRY GIFTS, LLC v. CHRIS BEERS VENTURES LLC
as 2:2022cv01360
Plaintiff:
ROSEWOOD FARMS COUNTRY GIFTS, LLC
Defendant:
CHRIS BEERS VENTURES LLC doing business as GRANDPA JOE'S CANDY SHOP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Beers v. Northumberland County et al
as 4:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Sherry Beers
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Bruce Kovach, Samuel J. Schiccatano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ENOXH V HICE ET AL
as 2:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
REV. AUGUSTUS SIMMONS ENOXH
Defendant:
M. HICE, COULEHAN, LT. TROUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. 119 LUCKY INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00957
Lead Plaintiff:
IVAN ORTIZ
Defendant:
119 LUCKY INC., KING DRAGON COLD BEER, SEAK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SIMMONS et al v. CRAIG STREET BEER CO.
as 2:2021cv01139
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R. SIMMONS and JOSEPH M. SIMMONS
Defendant:
CRAIG STREET BEER CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
