Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. v. Moates et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Moates, Misty Kieschnick and The Global Institute of Behavioral Practitioners and Examiners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. v. Moates et al
as 1:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Moates, Misty Kieschnick, Larry Kieschnick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Moates v. Arismendez
as 22-10377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Moates, MA, QBA, LBA
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Arismendez, in his capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, Texas Department of Licensing Regulation and Behavior Analyst Certification Board
Moates v. Arismendez et al
as 4:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Michael Moates
Defendant:
Michael Arismendez, Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation and Behavior Analyst Certification Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. et al v. Solis
as 1:2021cv02131
Plaintiff:
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc and NCS Pearson, Inc doing business as Pearson VUE
Defendant:
Dailys Solis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. et al v. Pelaez Elvirez
as 1:2021cv22833
Plaintiff:
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc., NCS Pearson, Inc., d/b/a Pearson Vue and NCS Pearson, Inc. doing business as Pearson Vue
Defendant:
Marta Pelaez Elvirez
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. et al v. Vera Rodriguez
as 1:2021cv22834
Plaintiff:
Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc., NCS Pearson, Inc., d/b/a Pearson Vue, Behavior Analyst Certification Board, Inc. doing business as Pearson Vue and others
Defendant:
Evelyn Vera Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
