Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Fantel v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia White, Scott Nieman, Dean Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers et al v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Gilbert M Rivera, Gilbert Bejarano, Patrick Coty Chester and others
Defendant:
J Adam Shepherd, Gila, County of, Penni Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bejarano v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00231
Defendant:
Justin Solberg, Penni Padgett, Gila, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Bejarano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bejarano v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01674
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
George Bejarano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bejarano v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Rebecca A Bejarano
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bejarano #247108 v. Melton
as 2:2015cv00652
Plaintiff:
Francisco Berola Bejarano
Defendant:
Kevin Melton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castro v. Microbusiness Advancement Center of Southern Arizona et al
as 4:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Carolina Y Castro
Defendant:
Microbusiness Advancement Center of Southern Arizona , Rozanna Bejarano and Unknown Bejarano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Valant v. Dupnik et al
as 4:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Edwin J Valant
Defendant:
Clarence Dupnik , Unknown Odell , Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mora-Bejarano v. USA
as 4:2007cv00505
Petitioner:
Juan Fernando Mora-Bejarano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
