Cases 21 - 30 of 4,008
Kabisch v. RealPage, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kabisch
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., Thoma Bravo Fund XIII, L.P., Thoma Bravo Fund XIV, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Kabisch v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kabisch
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Thoma Bravo Fund XIII LP, Thoma Bravo Fund XIV LP and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sanchez v. Bell
as 24-622
Plaintiff:
JORGE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
BELL, Officer, CALLENDER, LT., MANIK, A.D.A/Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Arthur BellIn re: Arthur Bell
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR BELL
Respondent:
KIM CARGOR, Warden
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company
as 2:2024mc00096
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Petitioner:
Tom Neltner
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin et al v. Edmond et al
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Prime Minister of Russia Vladimir Putin and LaKeshia R. Edmond
Defendant:
Derrick Edmond, Greystar doing business as Burnett Lofts and its financial institutions, AT&T Telecommunications and its financial institutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bells v. NDA, et al.
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORVILLE USP CORRECTIONS NDA, SHINN, MCCOLLOUGH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
