Cases 51 - 60 of 4,010
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Jones
as 2:2023mc00425
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Respondent:
Seth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Marine Taxonomic Services, Ltd.
as 2:2023mc00424
Respondent:
Marine Taxonomic Services, Ltd.
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Lynch v. Matterport, Inc, et al.
as 23-4281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN LYNCH
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTERPORT, INC, RJ PITTMAN, DAVE GAUSEBECK and others
US v. Michael Bell
as 23-4754
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL KENROY BELL, a/k/a Jamaica Mike
Castello v. Bell
as 23-7998
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENNETT CASTELLO
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent EARL BELL
United States of America v. Bell
as 23-4084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GLENN BELL
La Belle Maison v. AmRisc
as 23-30864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
La Belle Maison Associates, L.L.C., Bou MIkael Enterprises Incorporated, Sami Bou-Mikael and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AmRisc, L.P., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, severally subscribing to Certificate Number AMR-38859-07, Indian Harbor Insurance Company and others
Barker v. City of Scottsdale, et al.
as 23-3967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIANNE BARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a municipality of the State of Arizona, SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, sub agent City of Scottsdale, ALAN RODBELL, named as R Bell and others
United States of America v. Bell Wilson
as 23-3956
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER DECLAN BELL WILSON
Carter v. Bell Partners Inc
as 1:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
Charles Donnally Carter
Defendant:
Bell Partners Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
